Naked Sunday charges dismissed against FACT signer Sombat-Prachatai

April 13, 2012

[FACT comments: The important point here is that FACT signer Sombat was not acquitted, as reported in The Nation’s headline. We can hope other judges will grow a pair on the basis of this precedent. Or will the prosecutors appeal???]

Court dismisses case of Red Sunday leader for an activity under Emergency Decree in 2010

Prachatai: April 10, 2012

http://www.prachatai3.info/english/node/3155

On 10 April, the Bangkok North Municipal Court dismissed charges against Sombat Boon-ngam-anong, leader of the Red Sunday group, for his participation in an activity held under the Emergency Decree on 18 May 2010.

He was charged with taking part in a political gathering with five or more people, blocking traffic and causing public unrest in an area declared under the Emergency Decree, for participating in an activity called ‘Naked for Life’ at Din Daeng intersection in Bangkok to call on the Abhisit Vejjajiva government to stop the violent crackdown on the red shirts.

 Red-shirt activity ‘Naked for Life’ on 18 May 2010

According to his lawyer Phawinee Chumsri, the court said that violent incidents had already occurred, with real bullets used to kill and injure many people, and a stage had already been set before Sombat participated in the activity, and the activity was held in a peaceful manner, which is a right accorded by the constitution and cannot be derogated by the Emergency Decree, and was not meant to instigate unrest as charged.

And as Sombat was a member a subcommittee of the National Human Rights Commission which was studying the application of the Emergency Decree, he should, therefore, have been in such a gathering to make observations, the court said.

Sombat said that he had expected to be given a suspended jail sentence, similar to a previous case in which he had been found guilty for a similar alleged offence.  So he was quite surprised that the court dismissed this case.

The activity obviously did not provoke violence, and on the contrary, was an attempt to make people calm down.  Maybe that was why the court dismissed the case, he said, adding that he hoped that this case would set a precedent for other cases.

Source: 

http://www.prachatai.com/journal/2012/04/40026

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: